The far right media apparatus won’t let them know

While Sister and Niece were here for Thanksgiving yesterday I asked Niece where she gets her news. I asked because I’ve seen and written about articles saying where one gets their news correlated highly with how one voted. Niece says she ignores news as much as she can. When she feels she must know about an event she turns to the BBC for the British take on what Americans are doing. Or she checks out a Korean or other east Asian news source (she likes east Asian culture). If that still isn’t enough she turns to a service I think she called Ground that categorizes articles on how far to the left or right they are and puts that designation at the top of the article. I think it is wise for her to get her news in the way she does. Last Sunday I wrote about an article by John Stoehr, writing for his Editorial Board in which he disputed the idea that people who voted for the nasty guy would blame him for the damage he does to the economy. I summarized one of Stoehr’s points in part by saying, “the far right media apparatus won’t let them know...” On Wednesday Alix Breeden of Daily Kos reported that nasty junior talked to podcast host Michael Knowles, saying that the nasty guy was planning to install some conservative podcasters into the White House press briefing room. Though I shouldn’t have to, I’ll say it anyway, these are guys like Knowles and Joe Rogan who are strong supporters of the nasty guy. To make room for them nasty junior said that press passes for some traditional media would have to be revoked, “That's going to blow up some heads.” Breeden discussed an obvious problem with that – podcasters are not journalists and don’t have to (and won’t) adhere to any journalistic standards. While journalists in traditional media have varying standards, depending on the corporation behind them, at least they have some standards. Another big issue is we won’t know who is funding the podcasters. There was a case in September where far right influencers were found to unknowingly be funded by Russia. Those podcasters with direct access to the White House may not have any journalistic standards and may be funded by America’s enemies. The far right media apparatus won’t let us know what is really going on. Yesterday, Mark Sumner, Kos Emeritus, discussed the “joke” from Elon Musk that now that Comcast is spinning off MSNBC into a separate company Musk talked about buying it. Comcast is shedding several networks along with MSNBC. Comments on Musk’s X joked about Rachel Maddow being replaced by Joe Rogan. To think about what that would do to MSNBC one need only look at what Musk did to Twitter in turning it into X, a haven for far right trolls.

Musk is signaling that he has the limitless resources and unchecked power to purchase and shutter any outlet he believes represents a threat to Donald Trump or the incoming array of kleptocrats. He can not only silence perceived critics, he can do it on a whim. What Musk is suggesting is known as "media capture," and it's a common practice among authoritarian governments everywhere.

This is at a time when the right has media outlets at every level and is always available. There is no progressive media. The recent election showed how uninformed and misinformed many Americans already are. Yeah, conservatives like to decry PBS and NPR and other outlets as too liberal. But they still hold to the idea of “balanced” coverage that can leave lies unchallenged. These “centrist” news outlets skew right to avoid being seen as favoring the left. Notice how critical they were of Biden and Harris while sanewashing the nasty guy.

It has been clear, from 2016 to date, that there is no statement Trump could make that would cause the media to genuinely hold him to account. There has never—not even on the days when a jury held that he had sexually assaulted a woman in a dressing room, or when another jury found him guilty on 31 felony counts—been a time when news outlets barraged Trump in the way they did Hillary Clinton in 2016 or Kamala Harris in 2024.

And this is before being purchased by Musk. Authoritarian regimes do not tolerate independent reporting. In 2019 international agencies identified four steps that regimes use to capture the media. Capture the media regulator. In America that is the Federal Communication Commission, which regulates radio, TV, and the internet. The nasty guy selected Brendan Carr, who wrote the Project 2025 chapter on the FCC. He could revoke broadcast licenses that don’t parrot the administration. He could force Bluesky, the liberal haven from X, to reduce its content moderation. He could handle the lack of rural broadband with huge contracts with Musk’s Starlink. He could ignore the problems of Musk and other billionaires buying TV and radio stations. Control the public service broadcaster. For years Republicans have been reducing government funding for NPR and PBS. They could switch to controlling them – including programs for children. Use of state financing as a control tool. The drop in advertising has meant financial difficulties for newspapers as well as radio and TV stations that don’t have a deep-pocket owner. A lot of money could flow their way – if they’re willing to say the right things. Ownership control. Jeff Bezos may have spent $250 million on the Washington Post, but he spent twice that on one yacht, and he has several. Outlets owned by billionaires are ineffective in delivering news. They could easily switch to propaganda. Sumner listed a few possible headlines over the next few years. They haven’t happened – yet. Here’s a selection:

+ Fox News and Newsmax exclusively allowed on military bases + White House press conferences remove journalists under investigation for "treason" + Congress insists that Sesame Street include more Christian content

Sumner concluded:

America needs an opposition media. It needs one quickly. Unfortunately, there are no signs of that opposition emerging. Musk may be threatening to buy MSNBC, but in the meantime, the remainder of the media is signaling that they don't need to be captured — because they are willing to capitulate. This doesn’t mean the left should surrender. It just means that no one should expect the outlets that were unwilling to confront Trump when he was out of power, to stand up to him now that he has the backing of both Congress and the courts (and the money of Musk). We have to be our own heroes. Again.

The far right media apparatus won’t let them know. Crashing the economy with tariffs? Deporting millions whether or not they have citizenship? The fate of Ukraine and Gaza? The far right media apparatus won’t let them know. Hoomai29 of the Kos community wrote that Democrats should dump the Neoliberal economics that Reagan championed. The post begins with two wealth distribution charts. In France of 1760-90 the wealthiest ten percent of the population owned 60% of all wealth. In the US in 2016 that number is above 75%. The source is European Review of Economic History and the Federal Reserve Board’s Survey of Consumer Finances. The post then reviewed what Joseph Stiglitz says what 40 years of neoliberalism has given us: unprecedented inequality, stagnation of those with middle income and lost ground from those at the bottom, and declining life expectancy (including “deaths of despair”). Biden and Harris distanced themselves from neoliberalism but they didn’t rebuke it. General economy boosting measures that do not put more money in the pockets of the poor is killing the American Dream and killed Democrats’ chances at an American rebirth. Morgan Stephens of Kos reported several stories of various people who, after the election, are posting that they decided they will not visit MAGA relatives for the holidays. They are “defiantly speaking out about feeling betrayed by family and friends.” One mother said she will stay with her daughter, worried about birth control, and a trans son, who is a political target. A trans man in Colorado won’t go to Texas for the holidays and is considering whether to completely cut the relationship. One said you voted for a racist, a person who is taking away women’s and gay rights, so you’re not my friend. Fox News host Jesse Watters said he was disinvited by his Democratic mother. Another said they won’t unwrap gifts from people who voted for a party that talked about mass deportation. One said her relatives may come, though she’ll use “my special recipe of sarcasm, dark humor, and a heaping scoop of female rage.”

Those who voted for Trump have argued that “politics” shouldn’t come between friendships or family. But those who are choosing to cut ties aren’t buying it.

In 2016 people didn’t know if the nasty guy meant what he said. This time they do and some people are upset that family voted for him anyway. What the nasty guy and Republicans are saying feel like personal attacks. Vulnerable people aren’t able to stay in contact with family that voted to harm them. In a pundit roundup for Kos Greg Dworkin quoted a tweet by Steven Dennis:

Looks like Democrats will end up ~7500 votes short of winning the House majority across three districts. That's the difference between having the power of the purse, subpoenas etc — or not — in a nation of 330+ million.

Dworkin added:

It’s not just a 220-215 House with a narrower margin than this year by one seat. Without Matt Gaetz (resignation), Elise Stefanik (headed to the UN) and likely National Security Adviser Mike Waltz, it’s essentially a 217-215 House until spring. Sounds manageable, eh? What could go wrong?

Dworkin also quoted Dave Wasserman:

Pretty amazing that the House (likely 220R-215D) would have flipped to Dems this year while the White House/Senate flipped to the GOP, had it not been for Rs winning a majority on the NC Supreme Court in 2022, allowing GOP legislators to redraw three Dem seats into oblivion.

In the comments Mike Luckovich has a cartoon of a Thanksgiving feast. At one end of the table they’re all wearing red and at the other they’re all wearing blue. The gap between is big enough that the father needs a megaphone to ask for the potatoes. A cartoon by Mickey Hodges shows a woman on the phone saying, “I’m making my Thanksgiving guest list. How did you vote?”

A sledgehammer to the federal government

My Sunday movie was Joel Kim Booster, Psychosexual, a live taping of his stand up comedy act in Los Angeles in 2022. It’s just over an hour long. I had first heard Booster on the NPR show Wait, Wait, Don’t Tell Me. He is Korean, though adopted and raised by a white family, so he wasn’t raised in Asian culture. He’s also gay. I chose this one because I didn’t want a long movie and many towards the top of my to-see list are close or over two hours. I had also seen a few LGBT comics over the last few months (some great, some OK) and was willing to try another. I thought with a title of Psychosexual he would get into some interesting insights about the difference between men and women and LGBTQ and straight. Yeah, there was some of that. But the jokes and stories were a lot raunchier and there were more jokes about drugs than I would have liked. I guess I’ll need to check reviews some of the other comedian shows before watching. I’m done with the book The Fire Dwellers by Margaret Laurence. Being done with it isn’t the same as finishing. I bought the book at the Stratford Festival in Canada back in August. I had watched The Diviners and was delighted by it and how well it did what theater does best (quite different from what cinema does best). The play is based on a novel by Laurence that take place in the fictional town of Manawaka, Manitoba. This novel is part of a series based in that town. The series is highly regarded in Canada. Since I enjoyed the play so much I considered buying a novel in the series. Most of them are quite thick. I chose the one on the thinner side (300 pages) that had an appealing blurb on the back. The story is about Stacey, wife and mother of four ages 14 to 2. The setting is Vancouver (I presume) of about 1960. This story is part of the series because Stacey is from that small Manitoba town. The problem with the story is while there are incidents that happen, nothing seems to change. Stacey and her husband Mac are very bad at communicating – he tends to misinterpret her intent, then doesn’t want to talk about it, and she backs down way too easily. I got halfway through it, hoping the characters would show a little growth or there would be some explanation of why things are they way they are. But none of that by the halfway point. So I stopped. I wonder if my dissatisfaction with the story is part of the difference between what Americans and Canadians expect from their national stories. I know Americans want conflict, resolution, and a happy or triumphant ending. I’m not Canadian and haven’t read many Canadian novels so I’m not sure what they prize in their stories. This past Sunday was the 17th anniversary since I started this blog. This post is number 5363. Over the last 30 days there have been 13,500 views from Singapore, 5,380 from Hong Kong, 3,920 from Canada, 610 from the US, 580 from France, and smaller numbers from other countries. Since I was able to start keeping track of views in 2010 the top ten countries with the most views are the US, Singapore, Italy, Hong Kong, France, Russia, Germany, Sweden, Canada, and Britain. I know I wrote that I won’t be able to comment on all of the nasty guy’s horrible picks for cabinet positions and the horrible things they do. But some of them have to be mentioned. One that needs mentioning is the pick of Robert Kennedy Jr as the head of the Department of Health and Human Services. Walter Einenkel of Daily Kos reported on the pick and wrote:

Kennedy's history of pushing pseudoscience and debunked claims about vaccines is long and distressing, and his ideas to “Make America Healthy Again” are dubious at best.

Some of Kennedy’s ideas: He wants to remove fluoride from public water. He wants to “investigate” vaccine research. He wants to promote healthier diets (the same topic first lady Michelle Obama tried to promote). That last one could be good, or not, depending whether his definition of “healthy” is influenced by Big Ag. Einenkel also reported on reactions to Kennedy's nomination. Democrats are horrified. Republicans praise the pick or defer to the nasty guy. In an article posted on Kos, Arthur Allen of KFF Health News discussed the reaction of scientists to Kennedy's nomination. And much of that reaction is dread.

Should Kennedy win Senate confirmation, his critics say a radical antiestablishment medical movement with roots in past centuries would take power, threatening the achievements of a science-based public health order painstakingly built since World War II.

Allen wrote that Kennedy says Americans have been crushed by industrial food and drug company deception. I might agree about being crushed by industrial food. But the second part might mean new vaccines may never get approval and vaccine mandates might wither. Dangerous or useless therapies might be promoted. Scientists at National Institute for Health, Federal Drug Administration, and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention are considering retirement or work elsewhere amidst the talk of trimming the number of research institutes. In the comments of a pundit roundup for Kos exlrrp posted a meme:

got polio*? Me neither. Thanks Science. * or diptheria, pertussis, tetanus, measles, mumps, rubella, HPV Haemophilus, Pneumococcus, hepatitis A, hepatitis B, varicella.

Morgan Stephens of Kos reported that Caroline Kennedy, sister to Robert, has disavowed her brother because of the man and conspiracies he has embraced. Caroline’s siblings have also spoken against him. Oliver Willis of Kos wrote:

Republicans are expressing surprise in both public and private that with the announcement of his slate of unqualified Cabinet picks, Donald Trump is still as unhinged as he has always been. ... These picks are in line with Trump’s demonstrated leadership style, valuing people who appear on Fox News to say nice things about him over qualified experts. It is the leadership style that, in his first term, led to results like the failed response to the COVID-19 pandemic and a net job loss when other presidents, even Republican George W. Bush, managed to increase jobs. Despite this, there are new signs of supposed confusion and bewilderment from the GOP establishment. ... Republicans chose Trump to lead their party almost a decade ago. He hasn’t changed. Their purported surprise that he hasn’t changed is the only “shocking” part of this equation.

An Associated Press article posted on Kos reported that nasty junior said pushback from Washington establishment means the cabinet picks are the disruptors voters are demanding (well, some are, and they’re not a majority). And, compared to 2016, the nasty guy knows what to expect. One of those picks is Tulsi Gabbard, “a former Democratic lawmaker who has in the past publicly expressed sympathy to Russian causes, as director of U.S. intelligence services.” Embrace Moscow or get out. Max Burns of Kos wrote that a new president’s cabinet picks are a great view into how he will will govern. And the nasty guy’s picks are “a sledgehammer to the federal government.” They’re also a loyalty test for any Republican dissenters. Fall in line or a loyal candidate will be run against you in the next primary. And they nasty guy has been good at removing disloyal Republicans. That’s a good reason to fall in line.

How Senate Republicans respond to Trump’s list of patently unqualified grifters will determine the shape of our democracy not just over the next four years, but for future administrations. History is littered with the painful stories of legislatures voluntarily surrendering their independence to a corrupt and powerful leader. None of those stories have happy endings.

The nasty guy is the least intellectual occupant of the Oval Office. But he understands how weak people respond to pressure. Each of these nominees requires a different way to declare loyalty.

Kennedy requires the GOP to elevate a known kook and science denier to a critical science-based gig. Gaetz marks an explicit acceptance that the Department of Justice is now a Trump-captured body. [Defense nominee Pete] Hegseth is an admission that decades of Republican tough talk about standing by the troops has been a lie. And in Gabbard’s case, a final acceptance that Republicans are now an overtly pro-Russia, pro-Putin, NATO-skeptical party.

The nasty guy is demanding complete submission. It will redefine the relationship between Congress and the executive branch in ways that will affect the balance of power for years. Senate Republicans can protect the country. Do they have it in them? Republicans have been claiming this election and their sweep of the federal government gives them a “mandate.” Einenkel says don’t believe it. The nasty guy got under 50% of the popular vote. This is the most Senate races lost in states the presidential candidate won since 2004. One must go back 50 years for a smaller House majority. Tom Tomorrow posted a cartoon on Kos. It shows two guys in a car accelerating towards a cliff. The driver insists the last time the nasty guy was in the Oval Office was great and this time will be better. The passenger insists it will be a disaster. Once over the cliff the driver blames the passenger’s condescending attitude. Einenkel reported Democratic Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez has a few things to say about the election results. She mentions an ad that was anti-transgender.

"There is something to be said about—it doesn't matter that [Trump’s] lying. He's saying that ‘I'm fighting for you,’” she added after being asked about the seeming incongruence of being angry at billionaires and still voting for Trump, a billionaire. ... “What I think people are paying too much attention to is the first half of that ad, which says … 'Kamala Harris is for they/them,’” she said. “They're not focusing on the second half of that ad, where he said, 'Donald Trump is for you.'” “Political races are not about one candidate versus another candidate,” she added. “Too often it gets pigeonholed like that. It is a race to convince a person about who cares about you more."

Kos of Kos wrote about a tweet from October 2015 and how it applies today. The tweet is from Adrian Bott and says:

‘I never though leopards would eat MY face,’ sobs woman who voted for the Leopards Eating People’s Faces Party.

Kos offered some examples. Biden was the most pro-union president. The Teamsters refused to endorse him. Project 2025 “is an anti-union corporatist’s wet dream.” Leopards will feast. Muslim Americans didn’t vote for Democrats because of Biden’s support for Israel against Hamas. Muslim leaders are now deeply disappointed in the cabinet picks. It seems Netanyahu ignored Biden’s peace efforts in hopes of the nasty guy winning. Farming communities have been the bedrock of the nasty guy’s support. The farm industry is alarmed at the nasty guy’s proposed tariffs and that sales of soybeans and corn to China could be affected. They are also alarmed by his pick of Kennedy. The nasty guy has been talking about tariffs for quite a while. Weren’t they listening? Or did their source of news leave that part out? Perhaps Democrats should avoid bailing out farmers until they consider voting for Democrats. Immigrants believed that their undocumented relatives were safe because they weren’t “criminals.” Many women voted for both abortion rights and the nasty guy. Many in red states are thankful Obamacare saved their lives, yet voted for the party that has been trying to kill it.

From Social Security cuts to curbs on press freedoms, and from higher grocery prices to raw-milk illnesses, and to say nothing of the return of measles, polio, whooping cough, and other once-eradicated diseases—these next four years will be awful. And those bearing the brunt of the awfulness will be disproportionately Trump voters. And the rest of us? For now, all we can do is look on and ask every time a leopard takes a bite, “Is this what you voted for?”